Most of the projects include tax-exempt lessor structures. Since government entities and nonprofit organizations are exempt from genuine residential or commercial property taxes in a lot of jurisdictions, a ground lease between such entities and a borrower-sponsor provides a job the opportunity to either be exempt from residential or commercial property taxes or based on a payment-in-lieu of taxes plan, both of which can supply substantial cost savings over the life of a task.

In college, universities usually use avenue funded ground lease structures to develop student housing jobs. These projects consist of a ground lease between a university, as landlord, and the borrower-sponsor, as renter. The university consents to the ground lease due to the fact that, since the borrower-sponsor is accountable for payment of the bonds and the mortgage is on the leasehold, the university can develop a project on campus without incurring financial obligation and keep the task totally free once the ground lease is ended. During the regard to the ground lease, the arrangements of the ground lease offers a method for the university to control or monitor the task and receive a yearly ground lease rent.

In other markets, the company often owns the land and ground leases the arrive at which the job is to be built to the borrower-sponsor, who constructs the task and subleases it back to the issuer. Such a job gets approved for a genuine residential or commercial property tax exemption due to the fact that it is owned by a government entity, and because the federal government entity is also tenant under the sublease, the project receives sales tax exemptions on materials throughout construction. The issuer, as tenant under the sublease, is responsible for payment of the bonds, while the borrower-sponsor establishes and runs the task pursuant to terms of contracts with the provider. The borrower-sponsor normally has a chance to purchase the land and project as soon as the bonds are paid.

These structures present distinct threats to bond purchasers. The bonds are usually protected by mortgages on the leasehold and/or subleasehold estates. Bondholders need to bear in mind the rights of parties to end the ground lease or hinder their ability to work out treatments. If the ground lease is ended or the trustee can not seize the project, the corresponding lien on the physical task is snuffed out and the collateral bundle has no worth.

With that in mind, shareholders need to look for the following protections in any ground lease that becomes part of a community bond financing:

Term - the regard to the ground lease must be at least five years beyond the maturity date of the bonds, and shareholders need to promote more if at all possible. The extra five or more years enables a workout and extension of the term of the bonds in case it is needed to enable the job to capital to cover business expenses and financial obligation service. If the bonds on a project have a bullet maturity, the term of the ground lease need to be at least double the term of the bonds to permit a refunding of the growing bonds.
bloglines.com
Authorization - the ground lease should clearly license the borrower-sponsor to sustain a mortgage on the ground lease or else a court would think about the lien on the leasehold estate void.

Transfer and Assignment - the ground lease need to be assignable by the trustee without restrictions. Failure to consist of such arrangements might avoid a mortgagee from selling or moving the leasehold estate (by sale or otherwise) upon foreclosure or the execution of an assignment-in-lieu of foreclosure. It is necessary for the arrangements to enable the trustee to designate another entity to take position in lieu of the trustee given that the funding structure may rely on the status of borrower-sponsor to protect the tax-exempt status of the bonds and/or offer other tax advantages. Additionally, such designee needs to be entitled to a brand-new lease to help in the restructuring of the job upon foreclosure or assignment-in-lieu of foreclosure.

Notice and Opportunity to Cure - any notice of default by the occupant under the ground lease should be supplied to the trustee, and the trustee should have a chance to treatment of at least thirty days. An uncured occasion of default of occupant under the ground lease typically grants the lessor the right to terminate the ground lease, which would remove the trustee’s security. A notice and opportunity to cure permits the trustee to preserve its and later on seek reimbursement for such costs of customer under the leasehold mortgage, trust indenture or other bond files.

New Lease - if the ground lease is terminated for any reason, like termination upon default, or is turned down in personal bankruptcy, the trustee must have the chance to get in into a brand-new lease on the same terms.

No Modification - the ground lease ought to not be permitted to be customized without the consent of mortgagee, or else the property manager and customer might modify mortgagee rights and remedies without mortgagee’s understanding or permission.

In our experience representing bondholders, most of the ground leases we have actually evaluated have included the foregoing arrangements. As we have actually experienced more complicated financings, we have seen the following major problems:

Cross-Default - the ground lease and sublease should not cross-default with the trust indenture, loan contract or any other bond document (Example: “A default under the Trust Indenture is a default under this Lease …”). Any occasion of default under the bond documents should provide the trustee the opportunity to work out remedies, not offer the proprietor the chance to get rid of the leasehold estate and, as an outcome, the collateral, unless the trustee treatments borrower-sponsor’s default.

Third Party Beneficiary - the ground lease and sublease ought to recognize the trustee and any follower trustee as third-party recipients. This can be done by consisting of a provision that designates any leasehold mortgagee as a third-party beneficiary that can enforce the contract against the property manager and the tenant. Leasehold mortgagees are not celebrations to the ground lease, so a third-party beneficiary classification is required to implement mortgagee defenses in the ground lease and sublease against the proprietor and renter in court. Additionally, if success of the project is reliant on the proprietor and borrower-sponsor meeting certain requirements or offering particular services under the ground lease or sublease, the third-party beneficiary classification is needed for the leasehold mortgagee to implement those provisions versus the celebrations if they stop working to meet expectations.
questionsanswered.net
Borrower Notices and Consents - if the task is a lease-sublease structure where the borrower-sponsor is the renter under the ground lease and the proprietor under the sublease, the borrower-sponsor needs to have no approval rights on any mortgagee matters under the ground lease or the sublease. The borrower-sponsor as ground lease tenant and sublease property owner is more of a passthrough entity for the project up until the bonds are paid, while the borrower-sponsor as designer and manager is a true party-in-interest to the project. Just as designers and supervisors generally do not have authorization rights to adjustments of the collateral, the borrower-sponsor should not have those permission rights to the mortgage in the task. It grants the borrower-sponsor major leverage in an exercise against bondholders. If the borrower-sponsor has consent rights over mortgages in the sublease, for instance, it could avoid the execution of a mortgage on the subleasehold estate over overdue management and developer fees that are secondary to debt service.

Shared Parcels - the ground lease and sublease must be on their own subdivided plot, not part of a bigger cost estate parcel. When ground lease tasks are part of a larger fee estate parcel, the task is at threat of unrelated actions and charges on the cost estate. For example, if a proprietor that has actually ground leased part of the cost residential or commercial property to a project, funded by bonds and secured by a leasehold mortgage, decides to develop the rest of the residential or commercial property on the charge estate and protect it by a fee mortgage, a foreclosure of that cost mortgage would snuff out the leasehold and subleasehold estates. Similarly, if the property manager’s cost project incurs taxes, energy charges, house owners association charges or other costs that have the prospective to become “super liens” superior to the leasehold estate, a foreclosure of those liens would end the ground lease and sublease. If the ground lease and sublease should become part of a larger charge parcel, the ground lease and sublease should (a) need that any mortgage or lien put on the charge interest is subordinate to the ground lease, (b) require that the property manager promptly pays any charges or costs that risks the leaseholds, and © enable for the borrower-sponsor and the leasehold mortgagee to cure charges on the charge estate and look for compensation from the landlord.

Multiple Mortgagees - The ground lease should recognize the capacity for multiple mortgagees and focus on the most senior mortgagee. We have actually encountered tasks with multiple mortgagees where the mortgagees do not have an intercreditor agreement. In those cases, either the secondary mortgagees are secondary to the senior mortgagees based upon time of recording and the other bond files, or the secondary mortgagees have a springing security interest that attaches as soon as the senior bonds are settled. Because there is no intercreditor contract, the deal is silent regarding negotiation treatments upon an event of default. Subordinate mortgagees, who typically have a closer relationship with the borrower-sponsor and misaligned interest with the senior mortgagees, too typically take the reins working out with property managers in a workout without alerting or seeking advice from the senior mortgagees. Either the ground lease ought to clarify that the property manager will focus on the most senior secured mortgagee in settlement and disagreement resolution, and/or an intercreditor contract with clear guidelines need to be tape-recorded on the project.

Before investing in a ground lease project, bondholders need to totally comprehend the task and its dangers. While examining the main statement and engaging with the underwriter, this customer alert must work as an extensive checklist of issues that must be attended to. In the context of a minimal offering, point of view purchasers of the bonds have leverage to request our recommended changes to the ground lease. In those deals, a lot of property owners belong parties that straight take advantage of the avenue financed project. It would typically benefit proprietors for the tasks to succeed, and a failure to work out in good faith or a termination of the ground lease with a leasehold mortgage would adversely affect their credibility and score in the bond market. If any of these securities are not included when the bonds are provided, it is important to acquire them in an exercise as a condition for forbearance or refinancing.