For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a pal - my extremely own “best-selling” book.

“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few easy prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It’s an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, pipewiki.org but it’s likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet’s triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin “as a leading technology reporter …” - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There’s likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there’s a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I’m not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can’t - only Janet, who created it, can buy any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person’s name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, created by AI, and designed “exclusively to bring humour and joy”.

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a “customised gag gift”, and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to broaden his range, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps providing an autobiography service. It’s created to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human clients.

It’s likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, wiki.monnaie-libre.fr and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

“We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we really imply human creators’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators’ rights.

“This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It’s artworks. It’s records … The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that.”

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn’t stop the track’s developer attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, morphomics.science it was still hugely popular.

“I do not think making use of generative AI for imaginative functions should be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals’s work without authorization need to be prohibited,” Mr Newton Rex includes. “AI can be really effective however let’s build it ethically and fairly.”

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China’s DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America’s swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to use creators’ material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as “madness”.

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

“All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country’s creatives,” he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

“Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of delight,” says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

“The government is weakening one of its best carrying out industries on the vague pledge of growth.”

A government spokesperson said: “No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful strategy that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them license their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers.”

Under the UK federal government’s brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library including public data from a vast array of sources will likewise be made offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump’s go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI firms, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, forum.pinoo.com.tr and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under “fair usage” and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can constitute fair use - it’s not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn’t all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the most downloaded totally free app on Apple’s US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American’s existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly desire a “bestseller” I’ll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts due to the fact that it’s so long-winded.

But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I’m not exactly sure the length of time I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Register for our newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.